Two routes
| Route | How it arises | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Derived from country | Activity and place decide; nobody chooses, nobody may opt out | An organisation processing personal data is bound by KVKK in Türkiye and by GDPR in the European Union |
| Asked | A voluntary certificate; only the organisation knows | ISO 45001, ISO 14001, ISO 9001, ISO 50001 |
Why they are never in one list
Where both sit in a single questionnaire, unticking one box drops the law out of the list too. The result is a compliance tool that can switch itself off — worse than no tool, because it produces the feeling of being covered. A certificate is a choice; a statute is not.
The third case: reach
A regulation can bind you although it is not in force where you are: a Turkish organisation offering services to people in the European Union is bound by GDPR too. That is a different situation from KVKK binding the same organisation at home, and a screen has to be able to tell them apart — listing two laws side by side without saying why each applies makes the list unusable.
Requirements derived from activity
Alongside country, activity decides: hazard class, headcount, quantity of dangerous substances, explosive atmospheres, use of contractors. None of these is voluntary; once a threshold is passed the duty exists.
How this stands in Optifora
Every standard carries an adoption mode: four are asked (ISO 45001 · 14001 · 9001 · 50001), two are derived from country (KVKK · GDPR). In addition 2,116 hazard class rules and 84 periodic inspection rules open activity-derived duties by themselves; nobody can untick those.