Method and management system

Which risk assessment method should I choose?

The type of work chooses the method: a matrix for general workplace risk, a task analysis for single jobs, a guideword-based systematic study for continuous processes, and a protection-layer analysis where safeguards must be counted. No single method fits everything; most organisations run two or three side by side.

The work decides the method

A matrix (likelihood × severity) is fast and covers wide ground; its weakness is that the band thresholds have to be defined by the organisation — there is no universal cut-off. A task analysis breaks one job into steps and is the most productive method for maintenance and field work. A guideword study looks for deviations in piping and continuous processes; it needs a team and time. A protection-layer analysis weakens a scenario numerically through its safeguards and answers "are there enough layers".

Selection criteria

Three questions are enough. Is the subject a workplace, a task or a process? Who will use the result — the field crew or engineering? Do you hold numerical data (failure rates, demand frequency) or only expert judgement? Without numbers a layer analysis struggles; if the field crew will use it, a matrix and a task analysis travel better.

Optifora's method catalogue lists 34 methods with their inputs and result bands, so the choice is made by comparison rather than by guesswork.

Manage this in Optifora

Optifora is not a single program but a compliance platform assembled from modules. The catalogue states which module is ready today and which is on the roadmap.

See what Optifora is