Periodic inspection

How is a compliance evaluation carried out?

Clause 9.1.2 of ISO 45001 asks for compliance with legal requirements to be evaluated at planned intervals. The evaluation asks one question of every register line: is this provision met, and what is the evidence? The answer can be met, partly met or not met. The third is a finding and goes to corrective action; so does the second.

The method

For every provision in the register, three columns are filled: is it met, what is the evidence, who evaluated it and when. A line with an empty evidence column has not been evaluated — writing “yes” is not an evaluation.

Different from an internal audit

Compliance evaluationInternal audit
CriteriaLegal and other requirementsThe management system's requirements
Its questionAre we lawful?Does the system work?
IndependenceNot required, but preferableRequired

Neither replaces the other; an internal audit also asks whether the compliance evaluation was done.

Frequency

“At planned intervals” — the frequency follows risk. Areas that change often and carry heavy sanctions (fine amounts, inspection periods, training renewal) are evaluated more often; stable framework provisions less often.

Where the result goes

The result is an input to the management review. An unmet provision does not close until resources are decided there.

The trap of “partly met”

Writing “partly” is comforting and says nothing on its own. Unless which part is met and when the gap closes are written down, the line is copied unchanged into every future evaluation.

Manage this in Optifora

Optifora is not a single program but a compliance platform assembled from modules. The catalogue states which module is ready today and which is on the roadmap.

See what Optifora is