What the measurement found
29 CFR 1926 Subpart C was read in full. The result is clear: there is no general, content-listed, mandatory site plan. Equally there is no prior notice, no coordinator appointment and no health and safety file duty.
What exists instead
- Accident prevention programme: the employer initiates and maintains the programmes necessary to comply with the subpart. No written document or content list is demanded — but frequent and regular site inspections by a competent person are mandatory.
- Safety training and instruction: every worker is instructed in the recognition and avoidance of unsafe conditions, with specific instruction for toxic and corrosive substances, harmful plants and animals, and flammable liquids and gases.
- Shared responsibility: site-level arrangements are possible, but the prime contractor does not escape overall responsibility — joint responsibility applies.
What "not written" does not mean
No written plan being required does not mean no records are kept. An inspection asks for training, inspection and correction records; a programme with no records cannot be distinguished from a programme that does not exist.
What was not measured
State-level duties may add requirements — a state's own programme, for instance. That was not measured, and we do not present what we did not measure as measured. An employer's first question in the US is whether the state they work in has its own plan requirement.